LED Lighting vs. CFL and Incandescent Bulbs – Regarding EMF & EMI Levels
EMF TESTING – ARE LED LAMPS BETTER?
In theory for many applications, yes, but in practice there are several problems with them. (here is a personal revised repost from a technical forum I belong to)
While the LED itself has a long MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) rating, the weak point in LED bulbs is the AC/DC converter circuitry. In the 7 LEDs I have bought so far in the past 4 years, I have had 3 failures. One of them actually failed in less than a month which is atrociously worse than virtually any incandescent I have ever owned. Another one had a flicker problem which developed in just over a year (I just replaced that one this month) and another burned up a voltage regulator IC after a few years use. The inrush current and transients when you turn on an LED light can destroy cheap components over time just like any other bulb or piece of electronics.
I have found the ones with ribbed cooling fins to work better, but it is hit and miss as to which manufacturer and model you should get as there is enough variation between manufacturing runs due to corners getting cut without warning.
LED lighting – just like SSD (Solid State Drives) it promises to be a huge leap in reliability but a manufacturer always seems to figure out a way to pinch pennies and wreck that longevity gap. (some SSDs used to have just as high or an higher a failure rate than conventional hard drives until the manufacturers got their failure modes worked out.
Don’t get me wrong – I like LED lighting and have been converting over for years, but be careful in your research and purchasing decisions. Personally, I prefer Cree and Leit and have found them to be generally pretty reliable, but lately they are not being stocked in some of the big box hardware stores. Also, the majority of the form factors for lights bulbs such as the ones shown above are classified as A19. There is some confusion about light bulbs between A19s and E26s, but E26 refers to the screw in base part ONLY. All A19s have an E26 base, but not all E26 connected bulbs are the same shape as an A19.
And on that point there are a few good things left about incandescents in that they are better suited for accurate depictions of work in art galleries and museums. This metric is known as excellent CRI or Color Rendition Index, and they are typically rated around 98 % + while LEDs are typically in the low 80s. (but in recent times have now approached that of traditional incandescent lights) Also, they generally make better point source lighting which increases contrast when examining objects in fine detail. Finally, you have a warmer cast to the light which may be suitable for setting certain moods. (I have studied a little about lighting design)
I agreed that LEDs lighting is generally good and the direction we should go for MOST applications. But not all LED bulbs are created alike and you should consider the actual reliability based on manufacturer, model and manufacturing run. I have some that have lasted for years, another one didn’t even make it a month. (from a manufacturer / model that used to be good) Currently, I prefer to buy from a local store than online as it is easier to return if you get a dud. Incandescents and CFLs still have a very limited niche and I would only use them if you have a specific reason to do so. (and I do) CFLs also contain mercury and here is an article regarding that:
Mercury in CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lights) – How Much of a Toxic Health Hazard?
Five Major Myths About CFLs Explored
EPA Fact Sheet About Mercury in CFL Light Bulbs
Bear in mind that the biggest jump in energy efficiency was from incandescents to CFLs, (a factor of 4) but from CFLs to LEDs the jump is not quite as dramatic. (a factor of 2) Also, the weak link in any LED bulb is the AC/DC converter built inside – ribbed heat sinks help a lot and I don’t think it hurts to look for Energy Star rated bulbs. Otherwise, you can wind up with an LED bulb that does not even have nearly the longevity of an incandescent. I have seen it too many times.
From my experience, the Cree models sold on Amazon are pretty decent and the ratings currently look promising. Just hang on to the original factory packaging and look at the color temperature in Kelvin (not the same as actual temperature) so that you can “color match” your lights. From 2700 – 3200 K has a yellow cast with the “hotter” temperatures like 4500 K and up looking more and more bluish white and better suited to work lighting. Cooling ribs on the side promote longer life.
I prefer incandescents for the bathroom, but the higher color temperatures for task lighting and elsewhere. If you have a mismatched set in a ceiling fan for instance, it will be pretty obvious.
I will keep you posted if I find a really reliable brand, but manufacturers can go from great to crappy pretty quick. (what you bought last year may no longer be that reliable)
From an EMF standpoint, the lower current draw of an LED is attractive as that also lowers the magnetic field intensity. However, there is more potential EMI noise induced in the electrical wiring which can cause unexpected problems and anomalies with other electronic equipment. This is largely a function of how well the circuitry in the LED bulb is designed to suppress noise outgoing the return of the supply voltage line (120 VAC at 60 Hz in North America) and cheaper manufacturers often skip over or minimize that design consideration.
Fluorescent lighting also has an issue with EMI RF noise and for this reason they are not used in specialized rooms such as an MRI imaging suite. In general the noise is both conducted EMI and radiated EMI, but the conducted EMI part is what tends to predominantly affect equipment. An exception to that is if the wiring for the noisy ( or “dirty electricity” as some may call it ) is in very close proximity (typically inches) to a sensitive signal data line which does not have enough generic electromagnetic immunity to filter out this noise.
A comment I found online from a neighbor (NextDoor.Com) related an issue with the Internet connection of a residence that malfunctioned due to this noise:
“I did have that problem before and after MANY different visits it was discovered that the box on my house was close to my security lights. I had put the new CFL / LED lights in. That seemed to interfere. They moved my box and things have been fine since.”
WHO IS A CERTIFIED EMF CONSULTANT NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting is owned and operated by Joel-Anthony Gray who has over 22 years of experience as an EMF consultant, EMI troubleshooting expert and nuclear radiation testing consultant for a variety of commercial and industrial customers. While there is currently no such thing as a Certified EMF Consultant as far as the United States industrial and scientific community at large is concerned, what ScanTech offers is extensive education, experience and multiple certifications in non-ionizing radiation, industrial safety and hygiene. (listed here EMF Credentials) He holds numerous degrees and certifications which qualify him for this level of expertise. Call 214.912.4691
WHO DOES ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting professional commercial electromagnetic field testing and radio frequency testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth Texas area to detect and measure exposures and health risks (if any) to electromagnetic fields and radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES EMF TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting professional commercial electromagnetic field testing and radio frequency testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth Texas area to detect and measure exposures and health risks (if any) to electromagnetic fields and radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) & CELLULAR RADIATION (5G) TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides commercial radio frequency (RF) testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth Texas area to detect and measure exposures to all forms and frequencies of radio frequency radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES PACEMAKER EMI TESTING AND ELECTRICAL INTERFERENCE SURVEYS FOR IMPLANTED BIOMEDICAL DEVICES NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides professional EMI testing for pacemakers and other biomedical implants throughout the United States to detect and measure exposures to all forms of interference from electromagnetic radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES RF RADIO FREQUENCY CELL TOWER TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides commercial cellular testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth Texas area to detect and measure exposures to all forms of RF. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides commercial radio frequency (RF) testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth Texas area to detect and measure exposures to all forms of electromagnetic radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES ELECTRICAL INTERFERENCE TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides professional radio frequency (RF) testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth Texas area to detect and measure exposures to all forms of electromagnetic radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES NUCLEAR RADIOACTIVITY AND RADIATION TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides professional radioactivity testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth, Houston, Austin and San Antonio areas of Texas to detect and measure exposure to ionizing, nuclear or atomic radiation. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES DALLAS AREA PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING SURVEYS OR EXTERIOR LIGHTING STUDIES NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides professional photometric testing in the Dallas Texas area for commercial clients to help pass lighting ordinances for their Certificate of Occupancy. Call 214.912.4691
WHO OR WHAT COMPANY DOES ESD / ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE TESTING NEAR ME?
ScanTech Technical Consulting provides ESD testing in the Dallas – Fort Worth, Austin, San Antonio and Houston Texas area to evaluate, measure and perform Electrostatic Discharge testing and consulting for sensitive environments. Call 214.912.4691
We often serve clients in Texas, Michigan and Iowa. Cities for onsite commercial testing and inspection services include: Plano, Highland Park, University Park, Park Cities, Las Colinas, Arlington, Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Shreveport, Grapevine, Frisco, Denton, McKinney, Allen, Lewisville, Irving, Mesquite, Bedford, Euless, Richardson, Coppell, Grand Prairie, Garland, Addison, Farmers Branch, Rockwall, Carrollton, Parker, Rowlett, Lucas, Fairview, Park Cities, Keller, Roanoke, The Colony, Highland Village, Lake Dallas, Corinth, Prosper, Duncanville, Lancaster, Rowlett, Royse City, Princeton, Trophy Club, Southlake, Hurst, Round Rock, Georgetown, San Marcos, Cedar Park, The Woodlands and Spring. Counties served include Dallas, Collin, Denton, Tarrant, Rockwall, Harris and Travis County.
LARGER COMMERCIAL PROJECT SERVICE RANGE – NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL
Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Arkansas | California | Colorado | Connecticut | Delaware | Florida | Georgia | Hawaii | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana | Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | Michigan | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina | South Dakota | Tennessee | Texas | Utah | Vermont | Virginia | Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming | Washington D.C. (District of Columbia)
Major US Cities: Chicago, Detroit, Phoenix, Denver, Salt Lake City, Miami, Grand Rapids, Lansing, Nashville, Memphis, Atlanta, Charleston, Raleigh-Durham, Charlotte, Des Moines, Milwaukee
Countries served include the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand the UK / United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland) and Western Europe.
*LEGAL NOTICE*
All information on this website either written or implied is the express opinion of ScanTech Technical Consulting. ScanTech Technical Consulting and it’s owners are not responsible or liable for any damages arising from the misuse, misinterpretation or other consequences of the content of this website either in part or in whole. This includes all external weblinks, PDF documents, photos or other references (informational or otherwise) to 3rd parties including government agencies, health organizations, etc.
15770 Dallas Pkwy Suite # 900 Dallas, TX 75248 (Not Accepting Visitors due to C19)
Phone: (214).912.4691 https://emfsurvey.com
ScanTech Technical Consulting: Professional Electromagnetic EMF Consulting / EMI Testing for Biomedical Implant & Equipment, Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Testing & Environmental Studies and Inspections
COPYRIGHT 2002 – 2024
Thanks for the clear explanation about both led and incandescent. In conclusion i agree with you… switch to LED lights and start saving on your power bills.
Mr. Upreti,
Thank you very much for your kind comments about my LED vs. fluorescent / incandescent bulb analysis!
JAG of ScanTech
There was no comparison in EMFs emitted between the three types of light bulbs.
Mr. Carpenter,
>There was no comparison in EMFs emitted between the three types of light bulbs.
Not true as I clearly stated: “From an EMF standpoint, the lower current draw of an LED is attractive as that also lowers the magnetic field intensity.” Therefore, LED lighting generally has a lower magnetic field than that of other associated lighting in case you didn’t make the connection in my statement.
Please be a bit more thorough in your analysis of my commentary – thank you!
JAG of ScanTech